Real-life efficacy and drug continuation of secukinumab in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Aegean region of Turkey: a multicenter retrospective study and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab was demonstrated to be efficient in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the phase studies. Real-life treatment experiences obtained from patients that do not meet the inclusion criteria of phase studies can provide valuable information on efficacy and safety results. Results may also differ in different ethnic populations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate short and long-term efficacy and drug continuation of secukinumab in Turkish population. METHODS: The study conducted in three tertiary care psoriasis centers. Patients' demographic characteristics and week 0 / 4th week / 12th week / 1st year PASI values were analyzed. For systematic review of the literature a PubMed search using the keywords "secukinumab and real and psoriasis" from inception to April 2021 was performed. RESULTS: Mean PASI scores improved the compared to baseline at all assessment weeks (p = 0.000). In multivariate model, we found that bioexperience have negative influence on the PASI90 response at week 4. Univariate analysis showed significant relationship only between PASI90 response rate and gender at week 12 and year 1. Approximately 85% of patients remained on secukinumab treatment at the end of one year. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab seems to be an effective treatment option for plaque psoriasis. According to our knowledge, this is the first study concerning about long-term efficacy and drug continuation of secukinumab from Turkey.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on psoriasis patients, and their immunosuppressive treatment: a cross-sectional multicenter study from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapy has been a great concern during the pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the pandemic's impact on psoriasis patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter study was conducted in 14 tertiary dermatology centers. Demographic data, treatment status, disease course, and cases of COVID-19 were evaluated in patients with psoriasis using the immunosuppressive treatment. RESULTS: Of 1827 patients included, the drug adherence rate was 68.2%. Those receiving anti-interleukin (anti-IL) drugs were more likely to continue treatment than patients receiving conventional drugs (OR = 1.50, 95% CI, 1.181-1.895, p = .001). Disease worsening rate was 24.2% and drug dose reduction increased this rate 3.26 and drug withdrawal 8.71 times. Receiving anti-TNF or anti-IL drugs was associated with less disease worsening compared to conventional drugs (p = .038, p = .032; respectively). Drug withdrawal causes were 'unable to come' (39.6%), 'COVID concern' (25.3%), and 'physician's and patient's co-decision' (17.4%). Four patients had COVID-19 infection with mild symptoms. The incidence was 0.0022% while it was 0.0025% in the general population. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that psoriasis patients using systemic immunosuppressive do not have a higher, but even lower COVID-19 risk than the general population, and treatment compliance with biological drugs is higher.

Validation of the Simple Psoriatic Arthritis Screening (SiPAS) questionnaire in a Turkish psoriatic population.

OBJECTIVES: Screening of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis (PsO) is critical for the prevention of irreversible joint erosions, deformity, and disability. The SiPAS questionnaire is a short, simple and useful tool designed to screen PsA. This study aimed to evaluate validity of the SiPAS questionnaire in Turkish patients with PsO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Turkish translation of SiPAS was sent to us by the developer authors of the original index. Subjects were recruited from dermatology outpatient clinics. All patients' demographic parameters and SiPAS questionnaire results were recorded. After patients completed the questionnaire they were assessed by a rheumatologist according to standard protocol which included a complete history, detailed physical examination, laboratory tests and Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were assessed to obtain sensitivity and specificity of the Turkish version of the SiPAS questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty subjects were recruited into the study. The mean age of subjects were 43.5 years and the 55.4% of subjects were female. Of these, after rheumatologic evaluation 42 patients were diagnosed as PsA. The area under the ROC curve was 0.994 which means as excellent predictor and optimum cut-off threshold to discriminate patients diagnosed with PsA was 3 according to this ROC curve analysis. The overall sensitivity and specificity based on cut-off threshold of 3, were 97.6% and 94.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the SiPAS questionnaire is a simple useful, time-saving and valid tool for screening PsA in patients diagnosed with PsO with its high sensitivity and specificity. A SiPAS score ≥3 is an indication for referral to a rheumatologist.